Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 18:40:57 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Nate Eldredge <eldredge AT ap DOT net>
cc: Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc 2.8.0
In-Reply-To: <199801212339.PAA05804@adit.ap.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980122184039.1427G-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 21 Jan 1998, Nate Eldredge wrote:

> Maybe they decided their extensions weren't worth maintaining
> anymore. (Wow, *removing* features for a change? ;)

This could be true, but I find it hard to believe.  It might be a good
reason for splitting the library into two different packages, with the
extensions in the separate one, but not to deprecate libg++.  It's
weird, what can I say?