Date: Thu, 1 Jan 1998 22:15:16 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199801020315.WAA28535@delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.971124133939.23713Z-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Mon, 24 Nov 1997 13:40:25 +0200 (IST))
Subject: Re: c1args.c patches
Precedence: bulk


> ! /* #define ARG_MAX			4096 /* depends on LFN; use sysconf */

Shouldn't ARG_MAX depend on the transfer buffer size?  I don't see where
LFN comes into play here.

Also, gcc -Wall -Werror won't accept nested comments like that.

Perhaps you were thinking of NAME_MAX?