From: "Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer" <k3040e4 AT wildsau DOT idv-edu DOT uni-linz DOT ac DOT at>
Message-Id: <199711261656.RAA25208@wildsau.idv.uni-linz.ac.at>
Subject: Re: proposed fsext changes
To: randym AT acm DOT org (Randy Maas)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 17:56:48 +0100 (MET)
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, dj AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19971125104044.007e34f0@yacker.xiotech.com> from "Randy Maas" at Nov 25, 97 10:40:44 am
Return-Read-To: k3040e4 AT wildsau DOT idv DOT uni-linz DOT ac DOT at
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Could you please explain me your motivation behind this large
amount of fsext changes ?

If you want to write a pipe emulator or a RAM disk, fine, but
why blow up the standard library with lots of callbacks to your 
application instead of just going the other way round ?