Date: Sun, 19 Oct 1997 16:43:56 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
cc: Bill Currie <billc AT blackmagic DOT tait DOT co DOT nz>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Should off_t become unsigned?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.971015113545.28679A-100000@acp3bf>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.971019164336.27221B-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 15 Oct 1997, Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:

> > c:\io.sys
> 
> Sorry, but that's not entirely true, if memory serves: on non-MS versions
> of DOS (like IBM's PC-DOS, or DR/Novell DOS, maybe also Caldera OpenDOS),
> there is no io.sys. Instead, you'ld have an 'ibmbio.sys' (and 'ibmdos.sys'
> instead of msdos.sys). 

Actually, it's IBMBIO.COM instead of IO.SYS and IBMDOS.COM instead of
MSDOS.SYS.  At least, that's how these are called on IBM PC-DOS (never
had a chance to look at DR-DOS or OpenDOS).