Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 16:19:12 +1100
From: Bill Currie <billc AT blackmagic DOT tait DOT co DOT nz>
Subject: Re: Should off_t become unsigned?
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.971012143341.8447b-100000@is>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-id: <199710130316.QAA05322@teleng1.tait.co.nz gatekeeper.tait.co.nz>
Organization: Tait Electronics Limited
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Comments: Authenticated sender is <billc AT blackmagic DOT tait DOT co DOT nz>
Precedence: bulk

On 12 Oct 97 at 14:36, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> Since FAT32 drives are here and reportedly are even supported in
> plain DOS, maybe v2.02 should make off_t to be unsigned?  (Some of
> the library functions will need to be fixed as well, but that's
> another problem; I hope to be able to do that, with some help from a
> guy who has FAT32 drive on his machine). 

If it's any help, I also have fat32 so I can help with fat 
related issues (except I only have 2.1G) (and yes, plain dos 7 access 
it just fine).
Bill
--
Leave others their otherness.