Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 19:34:18 +0200
Message-Id: <199709161734.TAA13716@tyr.diku.dk>
From: Morten Welinder <terra AT diku DOT dk>
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970916160141.25597Q-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Tue, 16 Sep 1997 16:07:44 +0300 (IDT))
Subject: Re: Support for "//d/foo" pathnames
Precedence: bulk


   Is it a good idea to include support for the above in v2.02's putpath (to 
   be converted to "d:/foo")?

Sounds simple and good to me.

   An obvious disadvantage is that a UNC like \\server\foo might 
   get in the way (especially if ``server'' is a single letter).

How about

   //server/foo    UNC
   \\server\foo    UNC
   \\d\foo         UNC
   //d/foo         drive

or will that surprise someone?

Morten