Date: Wed, 06 Aug 1997 21:20:07 +0200 (MET DST) From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker Subject: Re: perl for djgpp In-reply-to: To: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Precedence: bulk On Wed, 6 Aug 1997, Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote: > > Bad idea, IMHO. All of "djgpp-workers" should by now be well aware that > > "persons who don't know much" will almost interpret this kind of > > distinction wrong 80% of the time. > > In my experience if you put 2 files called prg1.zip and prg2.zip the user will > download both thinking that it's just one big splitted to make more easy the > download. Even if you put it clear in a readme. Then don't do that, i.e. don't name them 'prg1.zip' and 'prg2.zip', but instead, call them by some mildly cryptic names that the user won't understand at all, unless (s)he took a look at the README. HBB