Date: Wed, 6 Aug 1997 13:33:23 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT mathematik DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de>
cc: Molnar Laszlo <molnarl AT cdata DOT tvnet DOT hu>,
        DJGPP workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: perl for djgpp
In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.95q.970806120919.24186D-100000@newton.mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970806133119.5438E-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 6 Aug 1997, Robert Hoehne wrote:

> Does this mean that I also had to include in the binutils
> port all that other big stuff, which normally nobody needs
> on DJGPP (libbfd.a, libopcodes.a libiberty.a, docs about
> the internals of BFD, header files for the additional libraries
> and so on ...) ?

In my opinion, yes.  If the resulting package is too large, and you think 
the additional libraries/docs won't be used too much, they can be put 
into a separate zip file, so only whoever needs them will fetch them.

But that is only my opinion.