Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 19:39:14 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199706232339.TAA26150@delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970623112111.31017B@acp3bf> (message from
	Hans-Bernhard Broeker on Mon, 23 Jun 1997 12:25:14 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject: Re: Library rebuilds
Precedence: bulk


> But, come to think of it, we wouldn't expect 'stub.h' or 'stubinfo.h' to
> really change because we recompiled 'djasm.exe', would we?

I wouldn't be surprised if it did.  We've done those kinds of
optimizations in the past, replacing 5-byte variants with 2-byte
variants for certain forms of some opcodes.

> - I don't think there's any *really* portable way to use recursive makes
> on both DJGPP and whatever Unix-alike you choose, without insisting on the
> presence of GNU make. At least none that I know.  So GNU make will
> probably have to be required, for 'make -C directory' and text
> transformation functions (wildcard(), and friends) to work. 

Requiring GNU make for cross-compiling is acceptable.