Message-Id: <199706122222.SAA17954@delorie.com>
From: Oberhumer Markus <k3040e4 AT c210 DOT edvz DOT uni-linz DOT ac DOT at>
Subject: Re: Latest stub
To: robert DOT hoehne AT mathematik DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de (Robert Hoehne)
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 00:17:57 +0200 (METDST)
Cc: k3040e4 AT c210 DOT edvz DOT uni-linz DOT ac DOT at, eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il,
        djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.95q.970612122729.26184A-100000@newton.mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de> from "Robert Hoehne" at Jun 12, 97 12:30:25 pm
Return-Read-To: markus DOT oberhumer AT jk DOT uni-linz DOT ac DOT at
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

> > Please be aware that there are some commonly used custom stubs
> > (PMODE, `DJP -s', DLM probably) that have a bigger size.
> > 
> > Will this cause problems with strip, size, nm, ... ?
> 
> As I said the limitation is to the size of the stub (2048 bytes)
> and nothing about the contents of the stub. And as far as I remember
> the stub used by DJP is also 2048 bytes long, isn't it?

DJP comes with an option ('-s') to put the decompression code into the stub -
in this case it will be 2560 bytes long.

The PMODE stub is > 10kB and I remember having seen some other stubs
(DLM ?) that are even longer.

Markus