Sender: vheyndri AT rug DOT ac DOT be
Message-Id: <33A0270F.B00@rug.ac.be>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 18:42:55 +0200
From: Vik Heyndrickx <Vik DOT Heyndrickx AT rug DOT ac DOT be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
Subject: Re: Latest stub
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970612181518 DOT 9257T-100000 AT is>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

> Also, IMHO, if it's not too painful, we shouldn't limit the transfer
> buffer size to 64K.  Charles' points (about DOS I/O limitations) are
> well-taken, but nonetheless people should be able to allocate any size
> DOS will let them have.  At least in the long run (like in the next
> DJGPP release).

But why would people want to allocate more than 64K. As CS says DOS
can't transfer more than 64Kb at a time. And I don't know of any BIOS
calls either that use this amount of sparse memory. If they want to have
memory, give it them. Give them flat memory (what an abstraction),
there's plenty of that. It's virtually [un]limited.

-- 
+----------------+
| Vik Heyndrickx |
+----------------+