Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 12:30:25 +0200 (METDST)
From: Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT mathematik DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de>
To: Oberhumer Markus <k3040e4 AT c210 DOT edvz DOT uni-linz DOT ac DOT at>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>,
        DJGPP workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: Latest stub
In-Reply-To: <199706112026.QAA27484@delorie.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.HPP.3.95q.970612122729.26184A-100000@newton.mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 11 Jun 1997, Oberhumer Markus wrote:

> > That means, any changes on the stub, which will exceed this limit
> > will be incompatible with binutils 2.8.1!!
> 
> Please be aware that there are some commonly used custom stubs
> (PMODE, `DJP -s', DLM probably) that have a bigger size.
> 
> Will this cause problems with strip, size, nm, ... ?

As I said the limitation is to the size of the stub (2048 bytes)
and nothing about the contents of the stub. And as far as I remember
the stub used by DJP is also 2048 bytes long, isn't it?

Robert