Message-Id: <199706112026.QAA27484@delorie.com>
From: Oberhumer Markus <k3040e4 AT c210 DOT edvz DOT uni-linz DOT ac DOT at>
Subject: Re: Latest stub
To: robert DOT hoehne AT mathematik DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 22:21:27 +0200 (METDST)
Cc: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.95q.970611114419.19296C-100000@newton.mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de> from "Robert Hoehne" at Jun 11, 97 11:53:57 am
Return-Read-To: markus DOT oberhumer AT jk DOT uni-linz DOT ac DOT at
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

> And a note for future changes at the stub. My current patches
> to the binutils assume a FIXED size of the stub of 2048 bytes.
> 
> That means, any changes on the stub, which will exceed this limit
> will be incompatible with binutils 2.8.1!!

Please be aware that there are some commonly used custom stubs
(PMODE, `DJP -s', DLM probably) that have a bigger size.

Will this cause problems with strip, size, nm, ... ?

Markus