Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 16:17:24 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Robert Hoehne <Robert DOT Hoehne AT Mathematik DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de>
cc: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: GDB and static variables
In-Reply-To: <32E8A066.5DE0@Mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970126161614.6261K-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


On Fri, 24 Jan 1997, Robert Hoehne wrote:

> Scott Frazer wrote:
> > 
> > a pain and ugly, it allows me to continue development.  I downloaded
> > the sources for GDB and looked around in the source code hoping for
> > something obvious to be wrong, but didn't have any luck.  Maybe
> I wish you good luck, because it's realy a hard work to find any
> possible bug in GDB from the sources.
> But to your problem. I think that this is not a bug of gdb or gcc
> but I think it is related to the COFF debugging format. I'm not
> sure but I will test it at home with my gcc, which can produce
> stabs debugging information.

How about adding the stabs support to the DJGPP binaries of gcc?  If it's 
so good, especially in case of C++, why should the users miss it?