Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 11:07:23 +0200 (IST) From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" Cc: DJGPP-WORKERS AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: DJ: can you put the new files separated? In-Reply-To: <9611011735.aa02559@ailin.inti.edu.ar> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Fri, 1 Nov 1996, Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote: > Can you put the corrected files of the package in separated files with the > package structure? > In this way is much more easy to download just the patched part of the > package. If you are talking about the library patches, just subscribe to djgpp-workers and install every posted patch which you believe is important into your private copy of the library. That's what I've been doing for ages. Anyway, this raises the important (IMHO) issue of DJGPP updates between major releases, and I'll just grab this opportunity to suggest something I've been thinking for a long time. It might be a good idea to have a directory where users could find patched exe binaries and either a patched .a libraries or (better still) compiled .o files ready to be put into a library. The source-level patches should be also available there, as the least docs of the patch and its reason. I even thought about an automated way that will take patches submitted to the bug-tracking system and produce such patched files automatically, but that might be too far-fetched (and many bugs don't get submitted there anyway). An alternative would be to update the affected zips much more frequently (like every month or so), but that would probably be too much of a burden for DJ and for the people who would like to download the fixed zips.