Message-ID: <32614CC3.750E@cs.com> Date: Sun, 13 Oct 1996 13:10:43 -0700 From: "John M. Aldrich" Reply-To: fighteer AT cs DOT com Organization: Three pounds of chaos and a pinch of salt MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: binutils 2.7 questions References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Oct 1996, John M. Aldrich wrote: > > > How about just saying '-o foo' to get 'foo', and '-o foo.exe' to get > > 'foo.exe'? Why all the fuss? > > AFAIK, this is how it works. However, the dispute was about what's the > default behavior when you don't say either. Actually, it isn't, and you missed my point too. :) Unless the behavior has changed from v2.00 to v2.01, when you specify '-o foo', you get _both_ foo and foo.exe which is stubified with the default stub. What I want is to get just foo, so I can stubify it with my own stub or whatever. Please, go back and read my post again. -- John M. Aldrich * Anything that happens, happens. * Anything that, in happening, causes something else to happen, causes something else to happen. * Anything that, in happening, causes itself to happen again, happens again. * It doesn't necessarily do it in chronological order, though. --- Douglas Adams