Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 09:45:46 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Cc: dj AT delorie DOT com, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: `abort' in nested programs
In-Reply-To: <9610031408.AA13391@clio.rice.edu>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961004094230.29098H-100000@is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


On Thu, 3 Oct 1996, Charles Sandmann wrote:

> > Here are the necessary patches to make a call to `abort' safe in nested
> 
> These patches are basis V2.0 - and I know I sent DJ changes to crt0.s to
> fix several problems.

Sorry, I forgot to look into the latest alpha.

> > I understand that dpmiexcp is always linked in, so that shouldn't be a 
> > problem.  Am I right on this?
> 
> Actually, this will break things like the TSR code, but I'm sort of used
> to things breaking between releases anymore.

Is there any way to do it without breaking that code?