Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 16:46:31 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT mathematik DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de>
Cc: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: v2 alpha 960911
In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.91.960912140951.8022A-100000@newton.mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960912164427.16232A-100000@is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


On Thu, 12 Sep 1996, Robert Hoehne wrote:

> I would prefer it. But why 'unzip386.exe' and not 'unzip.exe'? The people,
> who use DJGPP must have a 386 or higher.

I can guess that the reason is to make the program name unique.  There 
are many other unZip clones, all of them go by the name `unzip'.  (For 
instance, Borland C used to come with one such.)

Of course, I don't care how the program will be called.  In fact, on my 
machine it is called `unzip.exe'.