Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 15:09:42 +0400 (MSD)
From: "Alexander V. Lukyanov" <lav AT video DOT yars DOT free DOT net>
Message-Id: <199607301109.PAA29060@video.yars.free.net>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Long double support

> 1. put doprnt/printf/sprintf/fprintf etc into libm (I personally dislike it)
> 2. submit that 15k overhead
> 3. don't include higher precision conversion of long doubles in printf
4. Make that high prec functions optional, i.e. tell the user that
if he wants slightly better precision on long double printing, then
include an object file containing that functions on the command line.
I did not test it, but I think ld will remember symbols from object files
given on command line.

But the last does not seem too good for me.