Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:46:56 -0400
Message-Id: <199607260446.AAA26798@delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj>
To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <9607260432.AA09473@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject: Re: [k3040e4 AT c210 DOT edvz DOT uni-linz DOT ac DOT at: suggestion for <endian.h>]


> > Opinions on becoming yet more deviant from Posix?
> 
> Why not, it's in the right section :-)

I'd rather not add headers unless someone can show that the header is
a well-respected filename and declares well-established standard
symbols.

Is this the case for the proposed header?  If so, and it solves users
problems, fine, but I think it lets programmers write less portable
code by making djgpp look more like a non-compliant Linux system.