DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 60A9HpAv2985943 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=delorie.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=delorie.com X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 60A9Hohw2985914 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 60A9Hohw2985914 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gnu.org header.i=@gnu.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=ZU4EzcMP X-Recipient: dj AT delorie DOT com X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=n2E4Uos27/KfOWZ+RFyhsrduCDfeVEWKcXelCY0Xcjw=; b=ZU4EzcMPToGY 2a13wNPBooqymf412Ceerp4Gq7mqgyfIMCUMhUvMxNN9v6GEV0qFFtSCm9sNUtNOLdNm/lKELtLYh C0PHRJGMi1M3rx1P8A+xgypbdunpI+NjR4JJ+40Oht9L1edk9KSCJ74FVNxwmCobwWeahwp1FDVKd R0Hv/WytVyDFN2Z0Z7WEhkbtQz6oPse9yWwu4Eh7xmgpLgzwQs9U732Slhy7ZqF154KzC4zXgHDxj hxVbfUV3gyuN1eDdXBza7ze62JaVF2GEZnKy1X2CFA1NAiPjpT5tMCnNO7yK3KfbGkMlCAgG3wl9x TU1V6OW9ZJ3OCu30YaQfMg==; Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 11:17:46 +0200 Message-Id: <86fr8daksl.fsf@gnu.org> From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Cc: dj AT delorie DOT com In-Reply-To: (djgpp AT delorie DOT com) Subject: Re: Supported debug info formats References: Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 12:39:22 -0500 > From: "Simon Marchi (simon DOT marchi AT polymtl DOT ca) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" > > On 1/9/26 12:33 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > > IIRC we switched to dwarf a long time ago. We still use COFF for some > > internal things, but I think gdb doesn't need to worry about it any > > more. > > Ok thanks, I will propose a patch to remove the obsolete stuff from > coffread.c. Is it fine if I CC you on it so you can verify that it > doesn't remove anything still important? According to gdb/MAINTAINERS: Host/Native: [...] djgpp native Eli Zaretskii eliz AT gnu DOT org Please do CC djgpp AT delorie DOT com, though.