DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 45SL1uCn3841502 X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 45SL1uid3841483 X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1719608512; bh=lXen06hDAF4IERVTTQLqd2pR+1pVmcqlsSCoglkvuLA=; h=In-Reply-To:From:Date:References:To:Subject:Message-ID; b=stsZbO+Wi7Z+ra7EjSKDZ3+66WfMThQOEngVpc7cWVjDBu6EPZPziCdEcdDcjgfbz r8gL98nJy4DVPP/2o5pO7HyNqE0oUNxtrVqZ7pAT7i36YkYvFpgpHnRr4U4R9ViBvq ZCFBIOl3IrOtqLe0XfhSvlSjecXxAiqQ6K1hC/sI= Authentication-Results: mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-24.iva.yp-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Message-ID: Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 00:01:51 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: licensing questions Content-Language: en-US To: "DJ Delorie (dj AT delorie DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" References: From: "stsp (stsp2 AT yandex DOT ru) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk 28.06.2024 23:40, DJ Delorie (dj AT delorie DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > "stsp (stsp2 AT yandex DOT ru) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" > writes: >> I am trying to apply this "upgrade" procedure: > The DJGPP sources are not yours; changing the license in any way is not > an option for you. If you combined DJGPP sources with some other > sources that have a different license, you are limited to distributing > the combination under terms that comply with both licenses. > > I'm not opposed to clarifying copying.dj to have the usual "or any later > version" text, though. Could you please actually do that? You may also want to clarify what GPL version does it mean, as there is a similar problem. But I am not interested in GPL sources, as I removed them all (all but makemake.c). So I only need to find out what to do with LGPL ones. >> It says, among other things, that I need to replace v2 with v3 in all >> sources, and here is the problem: djgpp sources do not list v2 or >> v3. They instead refer to copying.dj, which explicitly forbids to >> modify these headings. Also copying.dj doesn't state what version of >> LGPL is that: is it v2+, or plain v2? > Assume the version that is in COPYING and COPYING.LIB, included with > djgpp. Versioning wasn't really an issue back then ;-) This is very vague. These files refer to v2, but they say "or any later version" internally. So if it is feasible, it would be best if you actually update copying.dj, and I'll start from there. Everything else puts me in an uncertain position: you mentioned "or any later version" in this e-mail, but it is not written anywhere else, but in your e-mail, so I probably can't rely on that until you actually add a clarification. Or, otherwise, could you please explicitly state that "or any later version" applies? I will then add your next e-mail to the source tree for the reference. Thank you!