X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Recipient: dj AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
	s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
	mime-version; bh=d6C4zEIqyavROpj3+CUBfdXqaxLGSnPSMILkXeGj4q8=; b=O4GQdLBleXT1
	k5X91z7SR1QXFxE1jktkoRznkcdToO2jXCuomVuL2GrR9aB4JBbn832VKHUX8d4rYHxuJ+fBXaBFt
	zxINj6G6UZYrpNR5mHprlcNNrqdarxyRKFtLXa9OJvUA01o8yONS2Q5vRQ+dvbRZKxUmNY4+xAuoX
	AP2pWyCTEuJulNmDQYV2RWkKvIUEsIjC+OM8K8rvdozRhIUXln6ysATaGHd2QzXtAX/y59MxW3P5c
	JUTaCPanuJe5SKXcWHDZDFozRBwCl2UvjG12ICxt3XU4cCTQCH4uY0t5NVmXJZIFiX3w8zov9msSQ
	daZgYYG6+3OGcJOsjL4wSQ==;
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:04:37 +0300
Message-Id: <86zftuk6pm.fsf@gnu.org>
From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To: Pali <pali AT pali DOT im>
Cc: dj AT delorie DOT com, sezeroz AT gmail DOT com, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20240414151845.xaaqybjtxnzyup6h@pali> (message from Pali on Sun,
	14 Apr 2024 17:18:45 +0200)
Subject: Re: Error handling in __djgpp_set_page_attributes()
References: <861q78nuk3 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
 <20240414100331 DOT yv4eqcr2ruhfbslk AT pali>
 <86sezome63 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
 <20240414104251 DOT bjvvmf2qzvhus3ug AT pali>
 <86r0f8makl DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
 <20240414121034 DOT h34pjed3s3udathh AT pali>
 <86jzl0m5x8 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
 <20240414134915 DOT k77cmfrcycetjsm5 AT pali>
 <86il0km2y9 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
 <20240414150520 DOT 4zua5mzxjjmat67r AT pali> <20240414151845 DOT xaaqybjtxnzyup6h AT pali>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 17:18:45 +0200
> From: Pali <pali AT pali DOT im>
> Cc: dj AT delorie DOT com, sezeroz AT gmail DOT com, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
> 
> What about this description? It is better?

Yes.  But you haven't fixed the two earlier comments: about the
"address range" part and about @: after "e.g.".