X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
	s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
	mime-version; bh=1kED/P6MnmkKPSwX6EnRV3GE2Zzam1dF+DkVMrI1ks0=; b=e3rUder4tcXR
	K8sjsJsD5mck4ZB+qLdFlaxVAmwae33jt6W0SzOqJ+Uz2JIyldoHPbM5H5RZPpDwuF4Kh1Kd/fjmn
	NeXovxvD5lDK4d0WpHlWcG2IM6b8C9lSwpZXRA6LuEA7pfwHMzDbVbb/X/umMJxebPwXeJuBpI6OG
	sY9Pz5JZmiV4LXRHwTBofSz2WLvx9wX7iQHFyM8a/DIkJpT7IzQuh15iiH0v4Eb4BUNVg4vWWH6ex
	FIRReD9J2uyHQAilsJWjrOVQsZKrfkaG7fnt1OuVSn9T5ECX0ECW0g5HarGmumYrr/oFbyr9FfgeH
	B+06cn1Zgzrml6aWJUFaDA==;
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 15:06:19 +0200
Message-Id: <86o7bum9is.fsf@gnu.org>
From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To: Pali <pali AT pali DOT im>
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20240225115526.mnx5jogkevlbjwu4@pali> (message from Pali on Sun,
	25 Feb 2024 12:55:26 +0100)
Subject: Re: DJGPP documentation updates
References: <20240213210641 DOT 52jnxonf3zuc2qxw AT pali>
 <CAA2C=vA9F0qL8vAw+FA5AtVavsEZqJKY=UrMz8MbpQa1POqjLA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <86mss3xfu9 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
 <20240217155210 DOT cs5mqv3izh5jlvee AT pali>
 <86eddbt6e3 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <20240225115526 DOT mnx5jogkevlbjwu4 AT pali>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 12:55:26 +0100
> From: Pali <pali AT pali DOT im>
> Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
> 
> Hello, I have there another documentation change. It fixes mistake in
> __dpmi_map_conventional_memory_in_memory_block() function. This function
> takes linear address, not the physical one (as defined in DPMI 1.0 spec).

Thanks, installed.