X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
        h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language
         :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from
         :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=YxosDZWwIYT2+jAb8AFAQ1qqnXFXK2Fb2Taz2UrwyoE=;
        b=Mz9/+nuzDBXweWUMNmp3Cpr+534DWRdo9SslwaCe3VC39G7DM2khVfO6aD9VV3p4Df
         YONDkY3FYKvqTFNOtPPxGhMvfP/sMAxLciYKCKEu1XwERQwWgrNxymW71aXOhja7bmQ+
         fjWWm8iyiecgQMlFLI0jqK6eph9sg/Oe74USLJhu4damMe++XzHKciFm52yBeMxtabnr
         31AL0FbozL2jWuc9BhaUf1fr1V+kOErQdO4r9HKLZJWI6bg4gR5wpURvtWuGiwltCwvh
         ZG6jshu/chVTPfDWnYsbrlkcHFJD28as2Vbw7JPHY3B+ohctSh6nv6GgIX1XdI6/Djzj
         F2Hg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language
         :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id
         :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=YxosDZWwIYT2+jAb8AFAQ1qqnXFXK2Fb2Taz2UrwyoE=;
        b=S4mZZuG+LihkO6CBMMtdKE8TKY3OLHvh0Fdmc2w3MgKWRENgZv/QAc9zMnyUmqpCI2
         3flC8PkMQFnCnkY/x4KdZCb4tsAg/8AzHAnzPnixooxMN+xYoSffZM8lm2qqB2kjRlCs
         1CMPP/SleLZbRNHeMU6zTIrhc4JgkIwRqsE0Y1NHgHDMoQVggV+5bul8F0Ehfb1LlBBX
         l7qcn5CPLwn/Ar7vFUyttYHmAIO2QsJJcJPTanjqk+dBIHKTSjIQViQ2Wux55ZSaMTju
         PDDz45ggrfmYXTv/9OrZbO3cV14lTHvM2gNjqcode9OSJwrypyVYI2fYT9vmSArF+yFx
         EK2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKV4yts7Uz9vlflSywsvW6rCEwshMmP3xxiygO0rGwIR1YNIqn6S
	np9+RWlky3rhtnrmicsfPriRz0y0c+kzgA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set97E7upmqOm/TwSS6NHjHs54n90RxgTh70SUX5HYXGDhrpa27RCCdpUMGW152ofKOs7VUr58Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5e47:b0:88d:ba89:1842 with SMTP id b7-20020a1709065e4700b0088dba891842mr1921719eju.19.1675276977243;
        Wed, 01 Feb 2023 10:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <f021de99-7d35-9958-b3c6-fdc67a280f35@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 19:42:56 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.6.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dxe3gen: invoke ld/as via gcc
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
References: <d67303fd-c302-82cc-bb0d-d1a21640d66f AT gmail DOT com>
 <CAA2C=vDYkF13NYPP_EXGMwzrjhLj2vEq68+-uYPfZOXpqWVRfQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <83r0vd78cu DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
 <CAA2C=vCCYsgtbQ5wsgbS3S4G7N+H5zi5DxCyVZLSkEKrSpifMw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <83o7qh74td DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
 <CAA2C=vDT10ZGfa3Mi2x0syvoT44Q3nfgcMfOwMZF=dM+ruL5OA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <b73813c5-0b91-6fa4-e4d2-55ddd97955a0 AT gmail DOT com>
 <CAA2C=vD5O16WsdfW9JqaDevTa2yqypD05fRFG+pW4T=3fq9SjA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <83o7qg5hah DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
 <CAA2C=vCFR6pAv9pWurZRcnhy-ok1rp_c08m4TN5UJJd9dx1qEQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CAA2C=vDGcOt1cnz9dnoV8neWxXN2S0anc=Pm4kBaV1LBjF3SNA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <83fsbq12sz DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
 <CAA2C=vDpV-UPne1E8+46XkSPAgDR-GBsmPq2v+BoYXqOMJXfXQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: "J.W. Jagersma (jwjagersma AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA2C=vDpV-UPne1E8+46XkSPAgDR-GBsmPq2v+BoYXqOMJXfXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 2023-02-01 08:25, Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> On 2/1/23, Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]
> <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>> From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]"
>>> <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
>>> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 23:17:13 +0300
>>>
>>>>>  If so, I'm okay with using GCC and documenting
>>>>> that 2.95 is no longer supported for this purpose.
>>>>
>>>> OK then, no objections from me. Feel free to apply the patch.
>>>
>>> Is JW's patch OK'ed? If it is, will you apply it or should I?
>>
>> Please apply, and thanks.
> 
> JW's patch is in the CVS now, after a re-diff and a minor edit.

Nice, thanks!  I see you cleaned up the allocation in main() a bit, this is
definitely a nicer solution.

Now, if anyone here could take the time to also look into the other two patches
I sent, I would highly appreciate it :)