X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WpCf4bhCrcqfqf7rQFyLrxBLoncleopXzwzNm2FvFqk=; b=MfWFNAXaIiCb3WCN9xwFt3EIm5m1x4M50m9EIT8gtXjgDidGa9+fZQMofsLyetaMq5 7V/AgVOOhiUEosOG1WDFx/Lc3uGo2WOCxLynfftcJEuBgb9l5FqXFdXd98iaYTozwNhh N/IcWZGxE89VitTc6B7Sx5Qog+Whg9eZUN/jMoMkVlJFybaeuMuoHoYj0he+per5TeCW CLUF+7BzLevfCbaSxL+a4LPwNPtzknzChAsC+Gihp7lj0VB9r+E9p4azOBP0RUWSUujQ Egy2xnfVtsYhykXoTlL3kztJQutWZLN6kBb3/nHGBv3hrFWOxhLh7SCykiDNCeK3XVmT zDEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WpCf4bhCrcqfqf7rQFyLrxBLoncleopXzwzNm2FvFqk=; b=S5nZ8gIDSd8jy5M97C5ckT9Onn/HjCXmxkYpoVyMNQXZFl5z7t7K6BWY+gEh4WZzHS QWvwIqFeHy3ww/cIk0Blg046I26JxYhViYM9NIuyAbuUKrpCPL4GkmsBiZoc4FRtHw7r mXUE5Y6HlQKm/rPZzDFmT7eHPyT+VnOmnzQBu+CdBy8V8ShNBnYTG5n/NjrqTbyrgf1Z 0CDx+aIdzaLRVt8gl8DIXjVrHCNUN5bePbIfNab6kHLMfweGHBsPaxxv/bl3tZ6k9mEv kl1ZNaquIGt5sJYahgH8X9UN6l1ouhm2ZXrnSkFiOv0Um3tkzWLDyqj1zIAsJs+2gAp2 PPwA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWpLj9vUfjKLpvD6RuuCriYtTlgLmOk9vDaLj8pvcQ/jh9uG2D2 aGc2160NikIDU2Xg8InRFXSSyUMtGUZpqM9ak1IA9uJs X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+zZSbs1qUx/rkzs0j4Y+48bUmRFBdnvkFCJBY+F872w6PUixS6Sq1WdFJtjj6Z3ZHzYRvQOTEFci1J+V8gA1k= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:354f:b0:3dc:40b4:2d1f with SMTP id i15-20020a05600c354f00b003dc40b42d1fmr191215wmq.174.1674912109985; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 05:21:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <3b8f674c-bca3-c679-952e-f8ba5af196e7 AT gmail DOT com> <500850be-fd64-3f82-a1e1-929903084e9b AT gmail DOT com> <3d9271ae-266d-ee7b-853b-984857ced1c8 AT gmail DOT com> <83sffvbux1 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <83mt63azwi DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <835ycravjo DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <83zga39fil DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <83v8kr9bye DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <83lelmakwk DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 16:21:48 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DXE3 with std::vector To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > BTW, if I revert the patch and go back to the previous version, -lgcc > problem can be easily worked around when using a makefile, like: > LIBGCCDIR = $(dir $(shell $(CC) -print-libgcc-file-name)) > my.dxe: > dxe3gen -o my.dxe -E _sym -U $(OBJS) -L$(LIBGCCDIR) -lgcc > > I even created a documentation patch to dxegen.txi for it. Should we > really keep the patch in, or revert it? And it is unnecessary behavior change when there is actually a solution so I vote for reverting.