X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=AOwX2o6X4SQKX00oEK9ZumhraRiC/zmT4B2TJ05ONNk=; b=eTfJaGQ5VwNW kAMM7RB40a3RWkKXJFJWbVRnHnBMfc51y9D+5HxRl/b8SGv55NcQCsFBpT4WdEY/L1uCG+vEFLZHz GLmqKp7hQbO2eNPIUC+rdVU/8e4e2MPHeoLrxFL2Vx6zcSfXwA0Dv4aqT/9LB9qXOvBkAHGEPytnV X989et9ST7VgwD9WtRGcB3vP/emi2o8oiOANrjWQV2/y3H0HCifjvqeWgo6RjNxLG6hrBExCWZYjL 9YrLd1urjrOXc+9m6JqhG1HAADDW5aanJZxj+25UkO4MMS1bEv3rvH7GEKptPcBVmmbpRr4OQnLe6 VD2jkQnmTT2d6VzFiUufzA==; Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 10:58:46 +0200 Message-Id: <834jsbavcp.fsf@gnu.org> From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In-Reply-To: (djgpp AT delorie DOT com) Subject: Re: DXE3 with std::vector References: <3b8f674c-bca3-c679-952e-f8ba5af196e7 AT gmail DOT com> <500850be-fd64-3f82-a1e1-929903084e9b AT gmail DOT com> <3d9271ae-266d-ee7b-853b-984857ced1c8 AT gmail DOT com> <83sffvbux1 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <82cff092-6dfe-1dfc-7946-cdb84c44e11b AT gmail DOT com> <114b292b-7f6c-3b19-7e9a-88a261ee063a AT gmail DOT com> <83h6wbayya DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com > From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" > Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 11:07:07 +0300 > > This can be a show stopper, so I _can_ revert the whole patch: The > patch was made for the whole purpose of dxe3gen finding -lgcc (and > -lstdc++) automatically in the first place, and one can just do the > manual labor of copying them to $(DJDIR)/lib easily (a documentation > about it from someone would be nice.) Having "-L$(DJDIR)/lib" and using GCC to find the standard libraries are not contradicting goals, are they? The -L switch just says "look in that directory as well", it doesn't replace the standard directories.