X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
        h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=eOXtDmJNHut725MTN30q/KbUDz1Wpz/jvlQlLXVjr1c=;
        b=UM4Kof7c6bbzW2y5O+j2d57f/048Flp+cK/DBCtJwD/oCNa9jVIHqQNn2iVOWqCtVi
         fTFWdjTsvT3vN16RBzckD88vYocir9TTqt/f1mMvrcZR340NF7V3/R0i1gH3H8irIaUA
         LRICBRqiyEPsMfe6uxKth8ugzrrRzAVxnvQzlp3OyQ1ClU0EhKPbPWb7qHI1ThZc7Ga5
         ybfr69YcV8ZmI8h1P5noZ1RtzHX/9oSK2luHNOvOlhAi6tzSuE7qSzkHtLaBtF4VBC3B
         XSNdBCJbD6tOkpViQUzrl3bdjcZ8VsKvNUmiP+JeU5zk0KxorfoYv3Zxfatxnf+c/2fa
         lh5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=eOXtDmJNHut725MTN30q/KbUDz1Wpz/jvlQlLXVjr1c=;
        b=Kua0apJRORWKw8tphXJxdfKbgh1IJZjprwb6Pe7WaCthUETYRutjPNh+mXDDYieNDu
         uipMUaf4ImDsHfDwDMjLZnriDOxJG0z1LX4etqlt7fvBpZUpdUdVvDdGSmpE1vCGABc8
         eFesXTYQCgQAeiqm+JtwvspT5DSs1iEYzBCBRiRIEknPpL73Z5wLxWJqgBDHeHihkmc/
         yiBUvekfCfUgLnXEDGl9n8KEKnHybzxFtP1Gka+bHfZ9Vb06wxCI6TDiiDtc2vewgRu9
         VDwBcKYAFbQC2T+3AwMv3FVIvKR1dx59H36H9Sr8UXdvaOPDjexRcL62hask6nhqNdmw
         Wrrg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kppyVqqyx8DYI/4P/LBr9VTR8ZnnCswX7Krs7OmPCiQR1thtyS7
	iw/Yu+iQ38qsawi2pJOrf+r9gOn7a02rjq/eZ4RvouiT
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtgy62JsH08SI0e/iN6BI4TW4kOxHSoebboDt/S5CHRf5O6VnBGKg0rkSIu7na+QfgijmxhGwJ5oChE8Akmpcc=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6b01:0:b0:2bc:7d91:f00 with SMTP id
 v1-20020a5d6b01000000b002bc7d910f00mr973418wrw.68.1674852371082; Fri, 27 Jan
 2023 12:46:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <83sffvbux1.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <edefcfee-d1ce-415a-8d1d-525a660fb0d5n AT googlegroups DOT com>
 <CAA2C=vCduRPA7Ky-kDqs=QtO-qi=DQczM6FMHhB+=Ltof54P=Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <c934abb6-c11e-0087-cd32-365d25d3f154 AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vCHMXDD8iewRStieHyTcgjGF3=d29LmMT53vrzGYe+zMQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CACuL_+CZm++qhEr7PedDmQaTxjZu9d-rVSw1bgPeist7XZ+dpQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CAA2C=vDPwv5G9DeFKyKFqt39cDDmO4LmDtbtMyoMdRR2xeEkow AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <3b8f674c-bca3-c679-952e-f8ba5af196e7 AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vBptnTAy2TA-pj5JCbAUJMiXkAAoP_xYFZZJ99iB7v9mQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <500850be-fd64-3f82-a1e1-929903084e9b AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vA0zXX3Sb49WBzU5g1-8dmO5G5wrb3uT+tLRq2LB0wu5Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <3d9271ae-266d-ee7b-853b-984857ced1c8 AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vD6sZpTicPh0xuJ16r76qBZ5BZro6x=9+=Z+P-0f_eRSA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <f04cd9db-fe76-219c-bacb-47711df559e2 AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vCv_bpM+iinTcreMJD_gv34Rna3jLspiLFfESFuNxOtoA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <af7fa08a-b074-0a4c-5e2f-99299940e3cc AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vB22rof4HPV_dVPy4tVmsmeDMy4G4r2Vx-_YLwOW6C9ug AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <bbdf1853-5454-93b2-fcf9-2306c6949c86 AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vBDi8gwhVVacnhnP+eufCkMNK4DancpOjnD7ScOWCEF6g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <83sffvbux1 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 23:46:10 +0300
Message-ID: <CAA2C=vAuq+O2gRRM--E0YAPy6D1pLgcP2r0-4+sCLis=kwGYzA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: DXE3 with std::vector
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

>> DJ, Eli: I'd like to apply this patch. Any objections?
>
> I won't fight its inclusion, but I wonder whether all of the aspects
> of this patch have been considered.  I'm worried by the changes in
> behavior this patch brings.  At least the following stand out:
>
>  the code will no longer heed DXE_LD_LIBRARY_PATH and DJDIR

I documented that in the applied patch:

https://www.delorie.com/bin/cvsweb.cgi/djgpp/src/docs/kb/wc206.txi
https://www.delorie.com/bin/cvsweb.cgi/djgpp/src/docs/kb/wc206.txi.diff?r1=1.15&r2=1.16

>  makefile.dxe uses "?=", which AFAICT we never used in the DJGPP
>  build tree

I can revert that part: Tell me?

>  What if someone wants to use those
> environment variables to tweak the build of a DXE?

One can simply use -L/some/path -lfoo (verified that it works)

> Also, this comment no longer describes what the code does, after the
> change:
>
>>    /* Allright, now run the assembler on the resulting file */
>> -  sprintf(cmdbuf, "%s -o %s %s", dxe_as, TEMP_O_FILE, TEMP_S_FILE);
>> +  sprintf(cmdbuf, "%s -c -o %s %s", dxe_cc, TEMP_O_FILE, TEMP_S_FILE);
>

Change to something like this??
/* Allright, now build resulting file */

> If you aren't going to wait for me to answer your questions, why ask
> me?

I got one response, thought it was enough. Sorry -- will wait
all next time.