X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: dj AT delorie DOT com X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=1CQJZCiM14Gmg3KQ4Msuhw3mTgIIRolbnEuikA+Yihs=; b=MrclAvceb2fa NlRopqPZSEOLLWqwaVuoP4Ss/rgTKcSlfZGK14c+4313p0zY9Cetg92uz0lkowdLnsMZd1pHn6Kai /cR9j5Rg+A1jHntAzmMFPNtK8+xafFhtcyHeD1KGDhaiqjbCP17eCiOIw12YfF6U8KrUbYZDhT1G6 JpmP1BiVQ0nmOxZqKvzsndUK9053Rc7C36+IXWiV2WPwQktVUef9SufHnFa+Xe4OzBiazcbiy2Lua igCdJHZBdnDRD2b0WaIBjSfM7PndIUaVhUgVzJQzDpdj9RWJvPl+BSCEj3dpBBvxueZyOeK+MBQZO kx+qs56HO3obQGADtyFiiA==; Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 22:24:27 +0200 Message-Id: <83pmazbu9w.fsf@gnu.org> From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Cc: dj AT delorie DOT com In-Reply-To: (djgpp AT delorie DOT com) Subject: Re: DXE3 with std::vector References: Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com > From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" > Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 23:00:28 +0300 > Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com > > On 1/27/23, DJ Delorie wrote: > > "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" > > writes: > >> Yes, this one does work, and yields an identical dxe. > >> > >> DJ, Eli: I'd like to apply this patch. Any objections? > > > > No objections from me. > > Patch now applied to cvs. Thanks. If you aren't going to wait for me to answer your questions, why ask me? As it happens, when I saw the question, I actually read the patch, thought about it, and posted a non-trivial response. I'd hope that the effort I made will not be wasted.