X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:26:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87sgjdfdnj.wl-tomas@basun.net> From: Tomas By To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Emacs 26 / FreeDOS In-Reply-To: <83imk9pmxx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87imkakuab DOT wl-tomas AT basun DOT net> <83wo8ppppd DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <8736bdh8vw DOT wl-tomas AT basun DOT net> <83imk9pmxx DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/25.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;tomas AT basun DOT net;1581690427;f64fdb5d; X-HE-SMSGID: 1j2bvV-0004cL-Vh Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:55:54 +0100, Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > I don't know anything about FreeDOS, especially not when run on a > dual-boot system where files were unzipped from Linux, sorry. Okay, maybe I shouldn't have said that, then. I think it is completely irrelevant to the issue at hand. The disk is just FAT32, all three OS's (Ubuntu, Win XP, Freedos) handle it. (I ran a disk test on it from WinXP and it said no errors. The FreeDOS "chkdsk" says FAT32 not yet supported) > Why not unzip the files from FreeDOS instead? That would at least > ensure that the OS on which you run Emacs can access the files and > directories. There was some silly error. The zip file was broken or something (it wasn't/isn't). But, as I tried to point out, everything worked fine, except for the single problem that they had to be deleted from Linux. > > They are there. That was the point of the cd in the bit i quoted. > > That trick could help you start Emacs, but I envision problems down > the road, so it's best to solve the original problem so that you don't > have to cd. That makes sense, but I did run it a little bit when starting it from the Emacs/bin directory. > Given this problem, I'm not sure trying older releases will help, but > then I don't really understand the problem, so my opinion doesn't mean > much in this case. So there is no chance there is any difference in the LFN handling? It seems a bit odd that I have never seen any errors or corrupted output anywhere that seems related to LFN. Everything seems to work perfectly, except for these seemingly distantly related problems. > > So what does that mean? mem says total memory 2,096,000K > > I think this means you are OK as far as memory is concerned. But where does 12M come from if I have 2GB? A default setting somewhere? /Tomas