X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2019 19:42:17 +0300
Message-Id: <838sr87yty.fsf@gnu.org>
From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <d97686df-50ba-5210-519a-abd80f2d190f@yandex.ru>
	(djgpp AT delorie DOT com)
Subject: Re: cwsdpmi borland compatible? possible! (Re: [PATCH] exec: fix
 inversions in leak detection logic)
References: <964e3268-2f75-ee73-ab5a-b01bf1aadb98 AT yandex DOT ru>
 <qjb14m$1kqj$1 AT gioia DOT aioe DOT org>
 <7209026e-1f1b-e590-00a3-4ed1a424cc0d AT yandex DOT ru>
 <qjfkbp$1o2c$1 AT gioia DOT aioe DOT org>
 <bd347f78-b176-6992-291c-2e542241efa1 AT yandex DOT ru>
 <d97686df-50ba-5210-519a-abd80f2d190f AT yandex DOT ru>
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "stsp (stsp2 AT yandex DOT ru) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
> Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 19:07:49 +0300
> 
> Now the question is: does anyone here think it would
> be a good idea to make cwsdpmi borland-compatible?
> (and MS-compatible, and whatever else)

Are there any downsides?

Also, how large would the changes be?