X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=GeSA3eNyOCz8Kc6cHSanGELr6ViyU9LIIIMPGEW2t2c=;
        b=AtxhG6WDi5ke+LygzNO83hAJne0MlbIQ92541nlzfANQZJV303lYGeKHE8oywOV5Z6
         p9L776dk+DzcTmq1EMV6PkddjSyvYJLdX9TA50viG4nYXmHl9Kze3XIJgUHmOkcwly5k
         IQ24tHL7HGCyfOl2E/MszDkkNMg9lcA/ZAZNVczgTL/P+mwWSUL2fw0YypZtbtipfqBb
         fk7FycQNEfU4ewPvs++n/28OscJfWd+EO4F93CmUi4biX1irFi7J0hs+HJcwfT58uu9K
         iXeGoJGFq5R3J5orW8zHyljKOK4HJql9rSUM1juhyuWGYwYvYkwp3ni3JlOgDvFm1pZd
         3YkQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=GeSA3eNyOCz8Kc6cHSanGELr6ViyU9LIIIMPGEW2t2c=;
        b=jeTDUcWWkdItG53LdfpC2VSkpvV31UrhtKhAbEAYemh1NFIlM6d7GYsFDFfIc8myJu
         DEUfhAOGmpC8E8v97WHG6zUDeBh3a/95HuKmKFw+efjw5g9maJDRgQJrA3C/7ohr3B76
         xExJ5kc+1T8luOoqCMjzjwWIlcwqUSKD/V2sXsY87mH600NP/2OwoYhWl0tcY3iTx7eh
         WJKHrHJWZ2CTPBrjcMTvTwpDTeVCw+PC9TDY1Nsr2+tAZUc/EgJB1dScD0Z0nUn3gJ14
         UFDrU+QfR+KhYW0RRhxHdlLJhNXPwKsmMiU/qnfmw9kXoyiLvzhiKDUNi2phmgcWHC1D
         cgog==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdUb2lMP94F1MHW2duiaKvr7pkh9UXB2lkMeoE2F4MVmnZbkU8H
	61WaSnFQDGMh53o5KvSj/HNo0mNVixGlPELv8ADiEQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225o5LJ4WmRhgzHQCX5XG5Q39IWRYrANMDakx/Xjwdww4mHG5tdyggVhcydP+L3lQxUCMk3tXvzO4qF/9iIHe1U=
X-Received: by 10.200.17.153 with SMTP id d25mr14188527qtj.97.1517466119951;
 Wed, 31 Jan 2018 22:21:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6abaf39f-c9f4-0fa0-50f0-21ab1b1d37b7@gmx.de>
References: <CAA2C=vA37w2SnCO_ZTeUSM-oQYUnVeOi7baxgYtx2T1JOKDCvw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <6abaf39f-c9f4-0fa0-50f0-21ab1b1d37b7 AT gmx DOT de>
From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:21:59 +0300
Message-ID: <CAA2C=vD9ViZfMty0Meh0XNz0rJDYv=Lze0uzD08+5nhBKrv3zA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Revert: "Prototypes of _doprnt, _doscan and _doscan_low moved to libc/doprsc.h"
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 2/1/18, Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via
djgpp AT delorie DOT com] <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> No objections, but ther next time you decide to fix things this way
> please tell
>
> it here at the mailing list so other people do not waist their time doing

Sorry, but what are you talking about??


>
> pointless double work.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Juan M. Guerrero
>
>
> Am 31.01.2018 um 11:55 schrieb Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via
> djgpp AT delorie DOT com]:
>> The attached patch reverts the changeset "Prototypes of _doprnt,
>> _doscan and _doscan_low moved to libc/doprsc.h"
>>
>> The rationale behind this changeset was a _doprnt() incompatibility
>> which had been added to binutils/bfd, but it has already been fixed:
>> http://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=8f314ad58ec824ce6c8467af29f11583f79a80ea
>>
>> Therefore, we don't need this change anymore. Besides, there can be
>> code out there expecting those protos in stdio.h..
>>
>> Objections?
>>
>> --
>> O.S.
>
>