X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: valloc() returns NULL for larger requests, but malloc works fine To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com References: <3459b672-8f4d-9840-5a01-246db011ed06 AT assembler DOT cz> <7020918f-80d2-4dc8-ba7c-7b1cd946d3da AT googlegroups DOT com> <681c7486-3ec7-5dc3-5a8d-d4d8b8500feb AT assembler DOT cz> From: "Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: <5f509765-e04d-a437-0d49-284f7a58ebe1@iki.fi> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 11:44:42 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <681c7486-3ec7-5dc3-5a8d-d4d8b8500feb@assembler.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 01.01.2018 21:36, Rudolf Marek (r DOT marek AT assembler DOT cz) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Hi. > > Dne 31.12.2017 v 04:43 rugxulo AT gmail DOT com [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] napsal(a): >> I don't think this needs a full libc re-release. But I doubt they're >> willing to waste much time anyways. >> >> If you need it that badly, just put a .ZIP somewhere with the patch >> and compiled (single?) .o file inside, and forget about it. > Well the point is that someone else will spent time debugging same issue over and over again. > > Should I open a bug report instead? > No need for separate bug report. Corresponding change is already in CVS. There are several accumulated changes since v2.05 in CVS. So perhaps I could put new packages in djgpp/beta/v2 or djgpp/alpha/v2 after some other changes will be in. Later a new version (2.06) could be released. Andris