X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 10:37:34 +0300 Message-Id: <8360brv269.fsf@gnu.org> From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: (message from Rod Pemberton on Sat, 7 Oct 2017 00:14:27 -0400) Subject: Re: DOSBox? References: <83poa0vc00 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: Rod Pemberton > Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 00:14:27 -0400 > > > > You took offense to it > > > > So would I. And so would any reasonable person, just ask around if > > you want an independent second opinion. > > Again, I think you're seriously confused No, _you_ are. You are being told in many different ways that this forum does not enforce that particular recommendation of the RFC. You may not like it, but in that case you will simply have to put up with it. Just like we put up with your so-called "polite and civil" style.