X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 06:11:12 +0300 Message-Id: <83ini6zmsv.fsf@gnu.org> From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <598108FD.5060908@gmx.de> (djgpp@delorie.com) Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GNU binutils 2.29 uploaded. References: <201707301540 DOT v6UFecLb017840 AT delorie DOT com> <5980C3AA DOT 2080305 AT gmx DOT de> <598108FD DOT 5060908 AT gmx DOT de> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 01:04:29 +0200 > From: "Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" > > IMHO it is easier to fix stdio.h than start endless discussion with the binutils > maintainers. I do not think that the DJGPP user group is still so large that > some one will be hurd if we change _doprnt by __doprnt or something similar. Renaming our _doprnt is certainly doable, but it means some application that really needs our _doprnt will now become broken. An alternative would be to move _doprint to some other header, like libc/doprnt.h.