X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: "Wiktor S. (wswiktorSP AT Mpoczta DOT fm) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: DJGPP and WIndows 10 32 bit Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 03:04:44 +0200 Organization: INTERIA.PL S.A. Lines: 60 Message-ID: References: <57265177 DOT 1090701 AT iki DOT fi> NNTP-Posting-Host: user-164-127-218-206.play-internet.pl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: usenet.news.interia.pl 1462410285 20397 164.127.218.206 (5 May 2016 01:04:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet AT firma DOT interia DOT pl NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 01:04:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Bytes: 2273 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com > later versions installed from binaries are not OK. Try compiling > "Hello World" style program which uses repeatedly under > WIn10 to get random failures. I'm getting them in average once per hundred > or several hundreds of compiles. In other > test I only repeatedly run preprocessor and compared it outputs. On a 150 MB FAT16 ramdisk I installed the following zips: bnu226br3 gcc610b gpp610b djdev205 and wrote the following BAT file: ================== @echo off set /a i=1 :loop echo iteration %i% gpp test.cpp -o test.exe if errorlevel 1 goto fail set /a i=i+1 goto loop :fail echo failed at iteration %i% ================== test.cpp is a simple hello world: ================== #include using namespace std; int main() { cout << "Hello, world!" << endl; return 0; } ================== On the first trial, it failed at 7th iteration with bogus compilation error inside iostreams. Consecutive trials seem to work longer and longer: 8, 14, 36, 84. So I restarted the machine. Again, failure on 5th attempt. That's nowhere near "several hundreds" you are getting. -- Wiktor S.