X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=P4rdX/Y1fsYLewRsnSw4oLMdBE6Ploj/rNgPhy1UNBE=;
        b=pBB/4Qh9CNR/OQVn7sYGP0S+j8U7x0M18jZjydj4SVNsgZTV9pMbT1o9UtwY4PwPCt
         87sTt4XzEGJdHoxsbNxbZ13KikFw8IqL8OOwu1Pb/0b/6qSLpVa3upJYoLL7omTgnajQ
         UXl2tuosoJf9Xr2iWSfLqwFvpkYyAjnP/CrwGPDOa/UCo8G5LnWsl8CavF+81aiQOioW
         Pq1obRfAmUmaBNT0ILvjvQBKqgICLCVqYjzofVAH7c8nofH3Ez5zE3JhZS1cbs7ow6LL
         eGbbMrYUR8ZC/L5Lbozh01gHVtXrO8wuTnRJHDF5l0lgBtHZslCBA79KYWLkmudRvkXw
         55pQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=P4rdX/Y1fsYLewRsnSw4oLMdBE6Ploj/rNgPhy1UNBE=;
        b=m5mGrdsK7YtheI69/vmxoSI6fwcKa8RbGPWiaEpnuiIoEptIFV//qe4mPwKRWrGBre
         9cbqlReMhFcCz2w4Fp7augKwyunkxIttq27dHoRz4oDNPXom/msDjx9N2bAOtI6TufKK
         cNkuOGZm02a5JkZ+09pHBP7dePhvS76mwP5SKdTZwz6+O7KjLRXHHC8fIjQUk6SRhy0B
         A7ncqj+WiMipnFJxD2ku8ao55yvgXamX1IiS22Vvmi/Y4xlbhXMmPb4T9ah1EzH2gRaW
         bBqsaw71wVbIA1oH27y4VBWGcjRN/fPYFtxfcjg27NMEMem6MBT1vZUlpBmPk85S7VCE
         n5Dg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQ/tUWxBHL5HeoaIsz/bSlCOIotr2aiCsJFdhuJstv8Xz26Hhkbv9xWNIXy7mHK0rJvXuLJOM728/RdcA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.17.70 with SMTP id m6mr11994718igd.1.1455546861221; Mon,
 15 Feb 2016 06:34:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <n9siu0$hu6$1@usenet.news.interia.pl>
References: <201601312013 DOT u0VKDC4O017569 AT delorie DOT com>
	<n8norb$gck$1 AT usenet DOT news DOT interia DOT pl>
	<56AF7CFB DOT 8010507 AT iki DOT fi>
	<n8obct$m4c$1 AT usenet DOT news DOT interia DOT pl>
	<83twlsyya8 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<56B03232 DOT 8040802 AT iki DOT fi>
	<n8skjg$bf4$1 AT usenet DOT news DOT interia DOT pl>
	<n9siu0$hu6$1 AT usenet DOT news DOT interia DOT pl>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:34:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CAA2C=vA5RH38h_XRjqdvifo_RXBONfnwWKr=q6rtFRtAbk0SjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Update of DJGPP port of gcc-5.3.0
From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 2/15/16, Wiktor S. (wswiktorSP AT Mpoczta DOT fm) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]
<djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>> Thanks. I made several tests and it seems it's not a GCC issue, but
>> binutils 2.26 regression.
>>
>> With GCC 5.3.0 and binutils 2.25 the game runs fine.
>
> This was a one-line problem in assembly code:
>
>     rep/movsl (%esi),(%edi)
>
> Newest as.exe generates wrong binary code on the above line. After changing
>
> to "rep movsl" with space it worked.
>
> I don't know if rep/movsl syntax is correct or not, but if it is not, AS
> should fail instead of silently generating bad code.

Do the binutils authors know about this?

--
O.S.