X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Received: by 10.13.217.12 with SMTP id b12mr23436642ywe.51.1445195152346; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:05:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.247.67 with SMTP id yc3mr180642obc.0.1445195152290; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:05:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=134.3.45.170; posting-account=OsAajgoAAADdKJnkJkmhzqP0jo6I_P_0 NNTP-Posting-Host: 134.3.45.170 References: <5611566C DOT 4020507 AT iki DOT fi> <561A4BCE DOT 7050606 AT iki DOT fi> <56213FE2 DOT 7090409 AT iki DOT fi> <562168C6 DOT 5050001 AT gmx DOT de> <5621D433 DOT 2020004 AT iki DOT fi> <201510170455 DOT t9H4tQuZ007926 AT delorie DOT com> <56225991 DOT 6040209 AT gmx DOT de> <8f98500f-b7bb-4bd0-9b94-1331361552a1 AT googlegroups DOT com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <6ed1a8e7-89a8-451b-b550-855f69f62b3c@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Random compile errors under WIndows (32 bit Windows Vista and Windows 10) From: "Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" Injection-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:05:52 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Bytes: 3640 Lines: 56 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Saturday, October 17, 2015 at 8:42:31 PM UTC+2, Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On 10/17/15, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > > On 10/17/15, Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via > > djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> On Saturday, October 17, 2015 at 4:47:54 PM UTC+2, Ozkan Sezer > >> (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >>> On 10/17/15, Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via > >>> djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >>> > Am 17.10.2015 06:55, schrieb DJ Delorie: > >>> >>> So guess we should actually release 2.05 now. > >>> >> > >>> [...] > >>> > a) now it is 15:45 here in germany. I will wait until 21:00 (local > >>> > time) > >>> > to see if Ozkan has committed his DXE module patch as presented in: > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > I do not want to apply it because I do not know if that is really > >>> > the > >>> > final version. If I see that he has not committed the patch, then > >>> > this > >>> > feature will definitively __NOT__ be part of the 205 release. > >>> > >>> I never got any response, so I am still waiting. The patch is final > >>> as far as I would implement it. So, here I ask: > >>> - Should I apply dxe patch to CVS HEAD? > >>> - Should I apply dxe patch to CVS v2_05_1 branch? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> O.S. > >> > >> Both branches. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Juan M. Guerrero > >> > > > > OK, applied to both branches. Thanks. > > > > -- > > O.S. > > > > And if it helps, here is my build from the unmodified v2_05_1 branch: > http://uhexen2.sf.net/tmp/v2_05_1/ > The packages were built with gcc-3.4.6 and binutils-2.25.1-r2 using a > linux-i686-to-djgpp cross-toolchain. > > (If they aren't needed, tell me so I can delete them to save space.) > > -- > O.S. The packages can be delete. Regards, Juan M. Guerrero