X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=p3VNQkLJAVeJLIpiMGWnsqp2dvGZVSJTcWA4qPH96hU=;
        b=Ol7u5vz7g+w/HZ9ioiJu36Zi2NaKEFJE4kj4K78n8KMDTrJ/yYr9v5GE+FE6/TdlNb
         G5cNzmZAsNn49C/SOHATMnc+7JAT/mA6Agh9NUlw/ilj0r/vRliwS8P/rf1C21zvmsfk
         nUnrB7aksKIlJqK5UauiRcJLBbGHsfwxcV84ulYShFB04qzyjCv7Gc4hURrlarQJMCMK
         06QaLuPLQxxbeNw/cetgfYkCA7VL8QSo8vkW/EnseCbSJXunq8qs4I56frI5cN4bWV6e
         P2d9sCyYJYJTm/1rQi7DYeM0pQdspYI7hLQdbGSyfmHnICVt2x359ecGr23bPViM1kht
         tgnA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.28.140 with SMTP id c134mr20647599ioc.93.1445107336992;
 Sat, 17 Oct 2015 11:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAA2C=vCC+Tj4wpp3bGYJ_qc0TeNUSdf8hHeO-NDUCGzbcsZT5g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5611566C DOT 4020507 AT iki DOT fi>
	<561A4BCE DOT 7050606 AT iki DOT fi>
	<56213FE2 DOT 7090409 AT iki DOT fi>
	<562168C6 DOT 5050001 AT gmx DOT de>
	<5621D433 DOT 2020004 AT iki DOT fi>
	<201510170455 DOT t9H4tQuZ007926 AT delorie DOT com>
	<56225991 DOT 6040209 AT gmx DOT de>
	<CAA2C=vDBK=CFc+rFH1JjG=9BgkAcvEq9aHAK-ndbyrbJip27ig AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<8f98500f-b7bb-4bd0-9b94-1331361552a1 AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vCC+Tj4wpp3bGYJ_qc0TeNUSdf8hHeO-NDUCGzbcsZT5g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 21:42:16 +0300
Message-ID: <CAA2C=vD=WJPA-6-Ehj7aMdPHkv3PMNnET+Ouhc6RF3tD87PonQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Random compile errors under WIndows (32 bit Windows Vista and
 Windows 10)
From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 10/17/15, Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> On 10/17/15, Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via
> djgpp AT delorie DOT com] <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>> On Saturday, October 17, 2015 at 4:47:54 PM UTC+2, Ozkan Sezer
>> (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>> On 10/17/15, Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via
>>> djgpp AT delorie DOT com] <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>> > Am 17.10.2015 06:55, schrieb DJ Delorie:
>>> >>> So guess we should actually release 2.05 now.
>>> >>
>>> [...]
>>> > a) now it is 15:45 here in germany.  I will wait until 21:00 (local
>>> > time)
>>> >    to see if Ozkan has committed his DXE module patch as presented in:
>>> >
>>> > <http://www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp/2015/10/04/13:58:46>
>>> >    I do not want to apply it because I do not know if that is really
>>> > the
>>> >    final version.  If I see that he has not committed the patch, then
>>> > this
>>> >    feature will definitively __NOT__ be part of the 205 release.
>>>
>>> I never got any response, so I am still waiting.  The patch is final
>>> as far as I would implement it.  So, here I ask:
>>> - Should I apply dxe patch to CVS HEAD?
>>> - Should I apply dxe patch to CVS v2_05_1 branch?
>>>
>>> --
>>> O.S.
>>
>> Both branches.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Juan M. Guerrero
>>
>
> OK, applied to both branches.  Thanks.
>
> --
> O.S.
>

And if it helps, here is my build from the unmodified v2_05_1 branch:
http://uhexen2.sf.net/tmp/v2_05_1/
The packages were built with gcc-3.4.6 and binutils-2.25.1-r2 using a
linux-i686-to-djgpp cross-toolchain.

(If they aren't needed, tell me so I can delete them to save space.)

--
O.S.