X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Received: by 10.66.144.164 with SMTP id sn4mr19216674pab.9.1445102411837; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 10:20:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.24.226 with SMTP id x2mr227941obf.8.1445102411798; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 10:20:11 -0700 (PDT) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 10:20:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=134.3.45.170; posting-account=OsAajgoAAADdKJnkJkmhzqP0jo6I_P_0 NNTP-Posting-Host: 134.3.45.170 References: <5611566C DOT 4020507 AT iki DOT fi> <561A4BCE DOT 7050606 AT iki DOT fi> <56213FE2 DOT 7090409 AT iki DOT fi> <562168C6 DOT 5050001 AT gmx DOT de> <5621D433 DOT 2020004 AT iki DOT fi> <201510170455 DOT t9H4tQuZ007926 AT delorie DOT com> <56225991 DOT 6040209 AT gmx DOT de> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <8f98500f-b7bb-4bd0-9b94-1331361552a1@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Random compile errors under WIndows (32 bit Windows Vista and Windows 10) From: "Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 17:20:11 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Bytes: 2543 Lines: 26 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Saturday, October 17, 2015 at 4:47:54 PM UTC+2, Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On 10/17/15, Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via > djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > Am 17.10.2015 06:55, schrieb DJ Delorie: > >>> So guess we should actually release 2.05 now. > >> > [...] > > a) now it is 15:45 here in germany. I will wait until 21:00 (local time) > > to see if Ozkan has committed his DXE module patch as presented in: > > > > > > I do not want to apply it because I do not know if that is really the > > final version. If I see that he has not committed the patch, then this > > feature will definitively __NOT__ be part of the 205 release. > > I never got any response, so I am still waiting. The patch is final > as far as I would implement it. So, here I ask: > - Should I apply dxe patch to CVS HEAD? > - Should I apply dxe patch to CVS v2_05_1 branch? > > -- > O.S. Both branches. Regards, Juan M. Guerrero