X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received: by 10.68.206.106 with SMTP id ln10mr12793312pbc.5.1443792613513;
        Fri, 02 Oct 2015 06:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.182.56.230 with SMTP id d6mr90732obq.9.1443792613473; Fri,
 02 Oct 2015 06:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 06:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <952a68b4-223b-4222-b456-35514bb8b7eb@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=208.123.184.66;
 posting-account=XGWx5woAAACFbFREYlembztJnxsJ2Of0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.123.184.66
References: <CAA2C=vAwcH9pHN63=Mskr9L016yAAJ6KkMPeuO9o_2cV7Pd0Kw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CAA2C=vDDN8UqGpbAzkba19Syq-1mLsBPAuSzSPWue_S2TYf_XQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <b8759e89-e375-4647-a9eb-64543cc49748 AT googlegroups DOT com> <CAA2C=vDSknbCKHzUA954weavLj16nXuDyP_Ggi+SmLJ_e-U_KA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CAA2C=vAdzu+ebq1mEsoqwkxJcYR+2EZdKJ3d5XxOZRCytL6z8w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <952a68b4-223b-4222-b456-35514bb8b7eb AT googlegroups DOT com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <59c392f6-7577-47b6-be50-0d8d37bbec16@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: dlclose not removing dependency dxes
From: "emoaddict15 AT gmail DOT com [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:30:13 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Bytes: 2170
Lines: 9
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Thursday, October 1, 2015 at 6:33:56 AM UTC-4, Juan Manuel Guerrero wrote:
> An inspection of your sample code and dldemo.cpp shows that it seems to be that it is the user's responsibility to explicitly dlclose every dlopen'ed modules.
> This is what an inspection of dldemo.cpp shows.
> This may not be what you expected from unix but I assume that no DJGPP developer has really promised that the behaviour would be identical to unix behaviour.
> Neither less I will inspect the issue during week-end but I do not promise that a fix will be possible.
> 
> Regards,
> Juan M. Guerrero

Thanks for looking into it.  We rely heavily on DXEs for our project! :)