X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fERMY2vMfwM3vAzif4Pz0GuW/x4hygnpIyrtIhgm7to=; b=wheOR8cGcYE97Fl9VR+RCka9Uvz45Jiwm0z93okWqFrWuXvbKSu2zlsrWkeC691UfN IKq49NhuzWFP1SbphKRzMPJZXnXBHGocxEntS9zK5PSOAYYbiICiZAk9dr9CluIt18VZ +mi2GFHvNxUtJHuUEig4QEfQMr8Wdbee5Izt5f2aWod/6/XD8qk/lD5A2iMUpK9uUZeX oYBQJ2yJsH4qxwRu9VNNxVshu/FGIul9GPVmqmZcHKwNps0ZZ1X2v3M1HooSCd7KAJNX bm98JLZ4XQw62kozrCcRGJ7mECVC/3+CXPRzs2D8sgAyOdS0qQU0tpLghDF8ajQzhlno QQWA== X-Received: by 10.50.78.98 with SMTP id a2mr18929654igx.87.1443471864760; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 13:24:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: djgpp to Linux ARM cross binutils To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com References: <5607D4C3 DOT 4040800 AT gmx DOT de> <4b10ba83-055b-4ff9-bdd1-81b37c9aee36 AT googlegroups DOT com> <56083B83 DOT 6040707 AT iki DOT fi> <56086184 DOT 9070505 AT gmx DOT de> <0d606330-1db7-4f3f-ba6a-f711ab5960d5 AT googlegroups DOT com> From: "Frank Sapone (emoaddict15 AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: <5609A1F7.6090201@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:24:23 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0d606330-1db7-4f3f-ba6a-f711ab5960d5@googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Well, this is the most important outcome of the experiment to me. ;-) > It shows that it is possible build binutils from the distributed DJGPP port > for other people than me. Neither less it remains a fact that it is necessary > to have some kind of Windows OS. All my intents to use plain DOS (aka either > DOS 7 from Win98SE or MSDOS 6.22 or FreeDOS) have miserably failed. The worst > seems to be FreeDOS but in the end they all fail and are useless. Here a lot of work needs to be done if plain DOS shall still be of some use to compile contemporary GNU software. I haven't tried compiling any of this stuff, but I can compile larger projects OK under DOS 7 but doslfn usually has to exist and you'll want your file handles to be set rather high (I usually set like FILES=100) for it to compile OK. Frank