X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1441819934; bh=Yt1jXb8fj7VVcSuIwvjiuZctwVRpY8NmJBwoL85tkQQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=HcIV8y29TyTnseZ4QrW/bbtAtNqpGgG46kdQsQylRIl1sc2xNyb6Vjz5jXTx6gTTTp13lznlFsjfmSPLZAeSMBfwEUpT/cb3MoOGxlBtrEeSxeKXrp1B2LF4QmE0iBYRv65ULXgapw/ZpPwT+TFUtsmIX2FOzngT5Tedt/7R/x06WY3ZLvgV/1ugSkUXJeI4FcFSYoTTIRZBQ3bCAEhkBmQbdZZ7vSs2/CPq+ur+5mgWMU3OhLOZMbga138j2eIMIuvj9AhgOLHMcPCIOJAfbSePjaMBJ/Pvdv/40HMZJVzVP+xZcxhvDv/HAFXAcKGJfgDmhIua75kaFFoZupzXgw== X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 397126 DOT 80722 DOT bm AT omp1027 DOT mail DOT bf1 DOT yahoo DOT com X-YMail-OSG: XatCm7cVM1lC0X1PkicjQc9kXHAu_PhVrFN.BTL7rWEiq2rYLOTPARgdQVbRFDV oaKz6473C5WG1Zf65DSxM1PY1_O4_7fl5JNihapPVtRkVqTSyEZYyM2cET4aV664IYsA23GN.rir Zzl1zWL3sUGPj7Eh2Jco6c1X9.kg6NhYUXREuv5ISL1gADMr9WFzpF4fnKXyG4iz7JdXmX9dZTer MfO6v_0e0hzsy.jEhuQNIYC_3LaND9912tRUOo1tkNqitnHAaKa.8IZ_faY0WJS.LJsFaL1TLTj9 Xb1JctDimrw6paa2C0vCzuVL01drhFxm08Qa3gOSeRnQkqlCyQxG.Hn8w5U73TNSvjsSxvXIfcYQ eyCyYyO4fqyrLiVWC6k.5Fu.eG3rWm0KxRaSBZIOIPmtNzJxJ9KzCkuzPU5gktgw38Ho7wVnIxSW S2wVFE955B9lXQB_aKluq508J9u3QMomxcy3K62cGKXLFUgDDY0unn78pyMSdYBXmAO61qAhasFX r1y9XvZvRYJmDDKSUG8XkCz395Nz9D162gjn09rkKhA-- Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 17:32:13 +0000 (UTC) From: "Peter Bailie (prbailie AT yahoo DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" To: "djgpp AT delorie DOT com" Message-ID: <1074050599.3777568.1441819933600.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <55E17D7D.4030406@gmx.de> References: <55E17D7D DOT 4030406 AT gmx DOT de> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP 2.05 release candidate MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3777567_1238564724.1441819933594" Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk ------=_Part_3777567_1238564724.1441819933594 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Juan, Is this new release compatible to 64 bit operating systems?=C2=A0 If it is = do I go to the link you show in your email? Thank you. =20 On Saturday, August 29, 2015 2:43 AM, "Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan.guer= rero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" wrote: =20 Am 09.06.2015 18:33, schrieb Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi): > This is announcement of release candidate of DJGPP 2.05 > > It has numerous changes since previous DJGPP 2.04 beta 1 release in 2003. > (http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=3Ddjgpp-announce= /2003/12/06/22:18:05) > Unfortunately DJGPP v2.04 was never released and old beta version slowly > became almost unusable together with other newer DJGPP packages. > > More information about changes in DJGPP 2.05 is available at > > http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/doc/kb/ > > both in sections about changes in 2.04 and 2.05. The same information is = also > available in file info/kb.inf in djdev205.zip > > It is expected to become actual release unless critcal bugs will be found= . > > Note that one should use djgpp v2.05 RC with other binary packages from > ftp://ftp.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/beta and NOT (ftp://ftp.delorie.com/pub/d= jgpp/current). > > The release candidate versiona is not available via the Zip Picker interf= ace. > You can download it from here: > > ftp://ftp.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/beta/v2 > > Additionally RPM packages (source and binary packages for i686 and x86_64= ) are > available from > > ftp://ftp.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms > > Binary RPM packages are built in such way that they are expected to insta= ll and > work on any recent enough RPM based Linux distribution (for example RHEL5= and newer > should be OK, RHEL4 perhaps not) > > Please see the README file for instructions on how to install the beta: > > ftp://ftp.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/beta/v2/readme.1st > > You can also download DJGPP 2.05 release candidate 1 from DJGPP mirror si= tes: > > http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/getting.html > > Thanks for all who have contributed to development of DJGPP > > Andris Pavenis > During this week-end I will update the complete DJGPP distribution to DJGPP= 2.05. This includes the rebuilding of all dj*zip archives so the lates changes of= the v2_05_1 branch is in the library and the moving of all new archives from th= e /beta tree into the /current tree.=C2=A0 Obsolete archives from the /current tree= will be moved into the /deleted tree.=C2=A0 Obsolete archives from the /beta tree will be= moved into the /deleted/beta tree.=C2=A0 Nothing will be lost. I will keep the latest version of every compiler serie.=C2=A0 A compiler se= rie is defined by its last version digit.=C2=A0 E.g. if there are gcc200, gcc201, gcc202, = gcc205 then I retain gcc205 and all the other ones will be moved into /deleted.=C2=A0 Att= ention: gcc20X is a different serie than gcc21X.=C2=A0 This has the consecuence that a lot= of compiler versions will remain in the /current directory.=C2=A0 If this is not wanted= this is the last occasion to speak. To fullfill this task I will use a slightly modified version of the script = proposed in: =C2=A0 http://www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi?p=3Ddjgpp/2015/08/16/08:0= 8:18 I have got neither a positive nor a negative reponse to that proposision so= I will assume that all agree and I will go ahead. I still have to do some preparations for all this, and that will take the r= est of the day. During this day I will wait for objections or suggestions and tomorrow I wi= ll update the /current directory if there are no ____really serious____ objections. Regards, Juan M. Guerrero ------=_Part_3777567_1238564724.1441819933594 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Juan,

Is this new release compatible to 64 bit op= erating systems?  If it is do I go to the link= you show in your email?

Thank you.



On Satu= rday, August 29, 2015 2:43 AM, "Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de)= [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:


Am 09.06.2015 18:33, schrieb An= dris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi):

> This is announ= cement of release candidate of DJGPP 2.05
>
> It has numerous changes since previous DJGPP 2.04 beta 1 rel= ease in 2003.
> (http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse= .cgi?p=3Ddjgpp-announce/2003/12/06/22:18:05)
> Unf= ortunately DJGPP v2.04 was never released and old beta version slowly
> became almost unusable together with other newer DJGPP pa= ckages.
>
> More information abou= t changes in DJGPP 2.05 is available at
>
> http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/doc/kb/
>
> both in sections about changes in 2.04 and 2.= 05. The same information is also
> available in file i= nfo/kb.inf in djdev205.zip
>
> It= is expected to become actual release unless critcal bugs will be found.>
> Note that one should use djgpp = v2.05 RC with other binary packages from
> ftp:= //ftp.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/beta and NOT (ftp://ftp.delorie.c= om/pub/djgpp/current).
>
> Th= e release candidate versiona is not available via the Zip Picker interface.=
> You can download it from here:
&g= t;
> ftp://ftp.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/beta/v2=
>
> Additionally RPM package= s (source and binary packages for i686 and x86_64) are
&g= t; available from
>
> ftp:= //ftp.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms
>
> Binary RPM packages are built in such way that they are expected to= install and
> work on any recent enough RPM based Lin= ux distribution (for example RHEL5 and newer
> should = be OK, RHEL4 perhaps not)
>
> Ple= ase see the README file for instructions on how to install the beta:
>
> ftp://ftp.delo= rie.com/pub/djgpp/beta/v2/readme.1st
>
> You can also download DJGPP 2.05 release candidate 1 from DJGPP= mirror sites:
>
> ht= tp://www.delorie.com/djgpp/getting.html
>
> Thanks for all who have contributed to development of DJGPP<= br clear=3D"none">>
> Andris Pavenis

>


Duri= ng this week-end I will update the complete DJGPP distribution to DJGPP 2.0= 5.
This includes the rebuilding of all dj*zip archives so= the lates changes of the
v2_05_1 branch is in the librar= y and the moving of all new archives from the /beta
tree = into the /current tree.  Obsolete archives from the /current tree will= be moved
into the /deleted tree.  Obsolete archives= from the /beta tree will be moved into
the /deleted/beta= tree.  Nothing will be lost.

I w= ill keep the latest version of every compiler serie.  A compiler serie= is defined
by its last version digit.  E.g. if ther= e are gcc200, gcc201, gcc202, gcc205 then I
retain gcc205= and all the other ones will be moved into /deleted.  Attention: gcc20= X
is a different serie than gcc21X.  This has the co= nsecuence that a lot of compiler
versions will remain in = the /current directory.  If this is not wanted this is the
last occasion to speak.

To full= fill this task I will use a slightly modified version of the script propose= d in:
  = http://www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi?p=3Ddjgpp/2015/08/16/08:08:18
I have got neither a positive nor a negative reponse to= that proposision so I will assume
that all agree and I w= ill go ahead.

I still have to do some = preparations for all this, and that will take the rest of the day.
During this day I will wait for objections or suggestions and tom= orrow I will update the
/current directory if there are n= o ____really serious____ objections.

<= br clear=3D"none">Regards,
Juan M. Guerrero



<= /div>
------=_Part_3777567_1238564724.1441819933594--