X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received: by 10.66.138.43 with SMTP id qn11mr20761502pab.8.1439237782378;
        Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.101.129 with SMTP id u1mr53933qge.27.1439237782078; Mon,
 10 Aug 2015 13:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <mpob96$vvo$1@usenet.news.interia.pl>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2.165.62.59; posting-account=v5xbdQoAAAAOGc9Ccc-kLZyobvPlN3Qr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2.165.62.59
References: <2af8c3c0-bc09-4de9-abe4-cfd6c947425a AT googlegroups DOT com> <mpob96$vvo$1 AT usenet DOT news DOT interia DOT pl>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <422e9328-994e-4485-95d3-2f0911cc6f74@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Keep 2.05 archives separate?
From: "Georg Potthast (dosusb AT googlemail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:16:22 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Bytes: 1303
Lines: 0
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

I wonder, do the experts think this is a bad idea? The wish that the djgpp users expressed here did not receive any response.