X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=7CTRVW8/g1RmhzMZBg9K67SS4yWlu6EU3jVISWZxZ8g=;
        b=US9ojWylNCeOfCEuhW9y3Nybc7oVlldQBCPGfXm/LWN0hAUU9kTSV6aFiCmtujYG+6
         iKfOdNQXvTV2Vx3sCtgR/G40j+Q24v8/2Pdm36h/U9TFa0297OUDODfDdD9S0MAVquV3
         MPtHYZL3AsTo3/EJGUim8eUZ1qhrXuSEM9SAwOEVG55Qz5IvXd7vajKwTB4XQbJfg+oW
         dmedlk2yNtObf1pRfIr1DYJKB7NT6Ncd3BDfPRyBKWz18kad3haqMsfUMn0h+xrrV+4v
         19doBVXvJC0cV7waRFKxJnPGcHGAwFVr2Vcq4lLDyQ9PjbkIwcRWMZjWox5kiDs93x6F
         RuoQ==
X-Received: by 10.107.152.81 with SMTP id a78mr17432605ioe.145.1438551387499;
        Sun, 02 Aug 2015 14:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Keep 2.05 archives separate?
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
References: <2af8c3c0-bc09-4de9-abe4-cfd6c947425a AT googlegroups DOT com>
From: "Frank Sapone (emoaddict15 AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID: <55BE8D59.7040104@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 17:36:25 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2af8c3c0-bc09-4de9-abe4-cfd6c947425a@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

I agree,  I was just thinking about this the other day.

On 8/2/2015 4:43 PM, Georg Potthast (dosusb AT googlemail DOT com) [via 
djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> I think it is great that Andris and Juan are making new archives for djgpp 2.05 all the time.
>
> These are marked "2.05 only" though. Why not make a separate directory on the ftp server vor "2.05 only" archives so existing 2.04 users do not download these in error and wonder why their djgpp environment does not work any more? I think most djgpp developers currently still have djgpp 2.04 installed. You should not expect the users to read the forum for possible announcements before downloading a needed package.
>
> Georg
>