X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received: by 10.129.72.74 with SMTP id v71mr14565509ywa.48.1438548190150;
        Sun, 02 Aug 2015 13:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.109.132 with SMTP id l4mr119049qgf.15.1438548190089;
 Sun, 02 Aug 2015 13:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 13:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2.160.51.27; posting-account=v5xbdQoAAAAOGc9Ccc-kLZyobvPlN3Qr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2.160.51.27
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2af8c3c0-bc09-4de9-abe4-cfd6c947425a@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Keep 2.05 archives separate?
From: "Georg Potthast (dosusb AT googlemail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 20:43:10 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Bytes: 1605
Lines: 10
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t72L02ft028291
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

I think it is great that Andris and Juan are making new archives for djgpp 2.05 all the time. 

These are marked "2.05 only" though. Why not make a separate directory on the ftp server vor "2.05 only" archives so existing 2.04 users do not download these in error and wonder why their djgpp environment does not work any more? I think most djgpp developers currently still have djgpp 2.04 installed. You should not expect the users to read the forum for possible announcements before downloading a needed package.

Georg