X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 17:42:35 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" Subject: Re: memalign In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Message-id: <83d1zg1ep0.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 17:26:23 +0300 > From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" > > On 7/15/15, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > > The new src/ansi/stdlib/nmalloc.c provides memalign(), so does the > > old src/compat/stdlib/memalign.c. Should we not comment out the > > memalign.c source in src/compat/stdlib/makefile? > > > > PING? I'd rather we split memalign from nmalloc.c, so as to avoid polluting the namespace when the user didn't ask for that.