X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=IxGliK7v8TTjQ9MqbWr6ogL9ifoWJStn2Pb8j9mNlrs=;
        b=EuJvPnICnuDfiXHcBFoqn0p6OvDQGx2P2EDRajeVoHnxPeGDFFur1COCiudcLZHrHv
         frlU6rzFT7hdz5KiBq330l3pc8OSjNuhAcX5dkOE8qnSj7BLmkh+QlNuFG0xI7UrpNbJ
         jaEJHrmT2BjTrmVWcLXqh4Rdh057iHtxNtHCUHUMLVWSVpveu861TtLaAHI/CyJltuZY
         F+/OgZZHTJw+5V8JdRGkCnh4fUgClZUHpu6Hr5QXXuEqDq0p2XdiAanUnG3vV/36mdv3
         l5byLnj18iFDx4hQbkB0FkPYE5M6F2aflH28a3QqArB9BqrV0zcBaG0STWrW7FDkg9lb
         Ujng==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.157.4 with SMTP id g4mr38184984ioe.66.1436640439526;
 Sat, 11 Jul 2015 11:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <558D3944.4070604@iki.fi>
References: <558D3944 DOT 4070604 AT iki DOT fi>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 21:47:19 +0300
Message-ID: <CAA2C=vCSZOMoFGV33sRKCvkmoWEHdewYJe9S6D4P=JcDOMO5oQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with configure mktime() tests
From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 6/26/15, Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi) <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> Noticed that mktime() tests run from bash-2.05b configure script fails:
> - goes into infinite loop when regenerated with autoconf-2.59 and gets
> interrupted after 60 seconds due to use of alarm() in the test
> - fail also when generated by autoconf-2.68
>
> See test program in attachment (configure generated by autoconf-2.68).
> Actual failing part of the test is
> spring_forward_gap()
>
> Andris

Any progress on this?  Is this the only thing blocking 2.05 release?

--
O.S.