X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=OwZlyPWBy/cSoRCEu1FlIJTbVoxpJLQIrvKg6dZ66EU=;
        b=gUIAOsyHwsQ+wht9ZMiZptS1m2Oocy1lZ4S3FqvFR+FKSOqaZuZ0ayv2nakolnKmE+
         CP2y6Fg9vECRsXQrLyMrSxSaHJ0sjKWJJGaXLGEFqhqAALTIvUpYGhWxaHXG0oeUQJjH
         OQVKnDtfqxGeWBKzF3Eaq5lopF9q7Qu6sxrrjQoZdQUAy/AQOnT/1VWIKOKurYNJAFjJ
         pehaf3/SBrHGt60Ih9nKrxYBKkMFdDKA5Zt+2SE8cWRPcQ+YliBiUSMJPG3ONbwTVivU
         PRDFTe9kT3quqfPLtgiNg7DJqPuO+pitLGwxooG7/zYm9G3fOo/5H5XNKxyy3s/nTT24
         uXtA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.45.207 with SMTP id p15mr14247765oem.34.1434775049912;
 Fri, 19 Jun 2015 21:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <073e9ce1-d1a5-4b89-8a84-447e013d021c@googlegroups.com>
References: <201506091712 DOT t59HCPci004068 AT delorie DOT com>
	<557739E0 DOT 6070608 AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAB9Rao93XrKFBpUDnZdjCz+rEXHGOU2RNKdou2oMLJOk802LnA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55775E64 DOT 2090901 AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAB9Rao-Njdr-CB=vqHnb+TVDmXu3eXqsB5CHB7V0kDwBEsM-WQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<5579ED42 DOT 6070309 AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAB9Rao8cvu3hLEf=KsRWn7woXka0F9Aax7uM9Jj5QqCO=1bL8w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<5579FE8D DOT 3080501 AT gmail DOT com>
	<557B436F DOT 1050101 AT gmx DOT de>
	<fe60143b-fe03-451f-84d4-a7d59a67cefc AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<d1f33445-bef3-42d5-a343-55fed9868908 AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<779efaf6-8ebf-4f2a-a526-a2773e3909b4 AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<4131b54f-b34d-4a84-ada6-3443ed9efce9 AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<20150618-004800 DOT 313 DOT 0 AT Your-Name-Here DOT News>
	<fda73a64-d86c-400d-a78d-4d11b067d138 AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vCYCjih4r38XZ45TURJPxpKAF40kakFM8iRizDH08QbVQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<65ad24c7-0888-4526-9395-e262f348a021 AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<5584B697 DOT 60303 AT gmail DOT com>
	<073e9ce1-d1a5-4b89-8a84-447e013d021c AT googlegroups DOT com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 21:37:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAB9Rao-5kU8Zqnkse_gX=WpAFBQfycNoMCB_gmqVhmZw4vtrwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: DJGGP 2.05 upgrade problems. (appologies)
From: "Louis Santillan (lpsantil AT gmail DOT com)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To: "djgpp AT delorie DOT com" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

I'd argue, again, the headers have unexpected behavior (in comparison
to linux), in the best case.

Looking at the two files [0][1], there's no mention of __STRICT_ANSI__
in the glibc version.

[0] http://www.delorie.com/bin/cvsweb.cgi/djgpp/include/fcntl.h?rev=1.11
[1] https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;a=blob_plain;f=io/fcntl.h;hb=HEAD

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 6:16 PM, RayeR (glaux AT centrum DOT cz)
<djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>> Like you mentioned, you have to use gcc 4 as 5 has issues with multiple
>> extern defines.
>
> I guess it could be cured by adding some -std=gnu99 to CFLAGS or how it is correct to properly interpret inline functions as gcc 5.x needs __inline__ __attribute__ ((__gnu_inline__))