X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: Jason Stevens Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: DJGGP 2.05 upgrade problems. (appologies) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 08:48:00 +0800 Organization: Super Global Mega Corp Lines: 39 Message-ID: <20150618-004800.313.0@Your-Name-Here.News> References: <201506091712 DOT t59HCPci004068 AT delorie DOT com> <557739E0 DOT 6070608 AT gmail DOT com> <55775E64 DOT 2090901 AT gmail DOT com> <5579ED42 DOT 6070309 AT gmail DOT com> <5579FE8D DOT 3080501 AT gmail DOT com> <557B436F DOT 1050101 AT gmx DOT de> <779efaf6-8ebf-4f2a-a526-a2773e3909b4 AT googlegroups DOT com> <4131b54f-b34d-4a84-ada6-3443ed9efce9 AT googlegroups DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2c1403dac57d9864a2959231725937f8"; logging-data="26310"; mail-complaints-to="abuse AT eternal-september DOT org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+mTznPs8Lzv7xu96VoiaUE" X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.16.0 (x86 64bit) Cancel-Lock: sha1:QkDfSQlUEtN+MY1ADvIw9pBUbSM= Bytes: 3534 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In article <4131b54f-b34d-4a84-ada6-3443ed9efce9 AT googlegroups DOT com>, glaux AT centrum DOT cz says... >> My point was that you may want to ask CWS directly. He's as close >> as you're going to get to the truth. Daniel Borca is, AFAIK, >> long since disappeared from DJGPP, so he's not much help. > >I hope that Juan Manuel Guerrero can tell us when he like to compile some DJGPP packages into DXEs. I don't need it, I'm just curious because Neozeed asked for that - in Quake2 port the unloading seems to be very necessary torstand that all such DLL code w I don't want to make is sound like I'm complaining about DJGPP the DLL thing or anytihng like that. I'm very appreciative for the DJGPP project for not only bringing GCC to the MS-DOS platform back when it was more active, but also for remaining active! It's still pretty amazing to see GCC 5 on MS- DOS! We've hit some bumps where it looks like some TCP/IP functionality is now included in the 2.05 which overlaps with WaTTCP, which causes various ioctl errors. I haven't even begun to look into what is going on, as it was easier (and from what I gathered recommended) to remain on the older 2.03. DLM doesn't appear to support DJGPP's DPMI hooks that we rely on, and DXE's don't unload cleanly. It's not the end of the world. If people really need that functionality it is available on Linux and Windows. That said, we built static versions of the Quake2 executable, and they seem to work fine for our original purposes. Which was more to see just how much Quake 2 is reliant on Quake 1, and to be able to turn older PC's into 'Quake terminals'. Again I don't want to sound like I'm all demanding you guys add functionality because it benefits me, getting 2.05 out the door is _FAR_ more important to show people that DOS/DJGPP is very much alive. Thanks for all your efforts!